Trusted Reviews is supported by its audience. If you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a commission.Learn more.
Fast Charge: Android needs an iPad Mini 6 rival
In This Article
OPINION: Any reader who’s followed Trusted Reviews over the last half decade will know, I’m not an Apple user outside of work hours.
This isn’t because I don’t recognise how good the firm’s hardware is – Deputy Editor Max Parker’siPhone 13 ProandiPhone 13 Pro Maxreviews this week attest to that. It’s because I don’t like how locked down their software is. Coming from a Linux background, I want to be able to set my device up as I want, even if it’s not THE most optimal way. I want to be able to run freeware, use any app store I choose. I don’t want a draconian set of rules, even if they are there for a reason, for the most part, on a device I own.
But this week, I well and truly had a moment of envy over a product I never expected – theiPad Mini 6. Glancing over at Max as he reviewed it I instantly realised quite how much I missed having a small form factor tablet, like the Nexus 7.
To catch younglings up, theNexus 7was a tablet Google built in partnership with Asus all the way back in 2012. It’s iconic in my mind for two reasons. First, because it was THE first good Android tablet. It followed the same model as Google Nexus phones offering users, at the time, top-level flagship parts, a completely unskinned version of Android with guaranteed updates and, most importantly, an affordable price tag. The combination was so good, I actually gave the device a perfect 5/5 when I reviewed it for V3 (the site I worked for at the time).
The second reason? In my mind, it’s pretty much the only Android tablet to beat, not match, its direct Apple rival. I remember comparing it to theiPad Mini (Gen 1)and thinking “why would someone pay the extra £50/$50 to get this instead of a Nexus 7?”
Both had suitably powerful processors to run every app you threw at them at the time, similar screen sizes, used IPS panels and generally were as like for like as Apple and Android products can get. The only benefits were Apple’s software, which was much more developed for a tablet form factor but had the same issues I mentioned earlier.
This is why when Google unceremoniously retired the Nexus 7 after two short generations I was outright gutted and to this day wish it would make a return.
This is especially true now with the tablet market being in an undeniably sorry state. As it stands Apple has next to no competition in the small-form-factor consumer tablet space. Samsung, Huawei and Xiaomi, the only big-name companies left making Android tablets. But the firms are all focussed on the top end 10-inch market and care more about taking on theiPad 8andiPad Pro (2021)than the mini.
Here’s hoping Google, or another Android OEM, spots the gap and we at the very least get a spiritual successor to the Nexus 7 in the near future.
You might like…
Alastair is in charge of Trusted Reviews Limited’s editorial strategy and output across all its sites. He has over a decade’s experience as a journalist working in both B2C and B2B press. During this …
Founded in 2003, Trusted Reviews exists to give our readers thorough, unbiased and independent advice on what to buy.
Today, we have millions of users a month from around the world, and assess more than 1,000 products a year.
Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.
We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.
Why trust our journalism?
Founded in 2003, Trusted Reviews exists to give our readers thorough, unbiased and independent advice on what to buy.
Today, we have millions of users a month from around the world, and assess more than 1,000 products a year.
Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.
We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.
